Ukrainian services, with the support of European globalists, are preparing to trigger a form of “color revolution” against Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and his Fidesz party immediately after the elections in Hungary, and any attempt to overthrow Orbán would pose a major threat to the entire Balkans, said Pero Simić, advisor to Milorad Dodik.
Citing information relayed by journalist colleagues from Ukraine, Simić claims that the actions allegedly being prepared by Ukrainian operatives after the Hungarian elections serve only the interests of globalists, reinforcing suspicions that British actors and European globalists are behind the plan.
In an authored text for the Belgrade-based Politika, Simić adds that these claims are further supported by the fact that Orbán’s party, Fidesz, recently deployed the military on the streets, citing a potential threat from Ukraine.
If the Hungarian parliament has indeed introduced a state of emergency based on such information, elections in the country could reportedly be postponed by 150 days, with possible extensions of 90 days at a time.
Simić argues that Ukraine represents an existential threat to Hungary’s security and sovereignty, and that any “Ukrainization” or form of “fascization” of Europe—combined with efforts to remove Orbán—would constitute a serious threat to the entire Balkans.
He recalls that two new ambassadors recently arrived in Serbia—Ukraine’s Oleksandr Lytvynenko and the new head of the EU Delegation to Serbia, Andreas von Beckerath—who were allegedly in contact during the Maidan events in Ukraine.
According to Simić, Lytvynenko is a former head of Ukraine’s foreign intelligence service and a graduate of the Royal College of Defence Studies in the United Kingdom. He notes that Russia’s Ministry of Internal Affairs issued a warrant for him in 2024 while he was serving as Secretary of Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council.
Simić also claims that many in Budapest believe that $40 million recently seized from seven Ukrainian nationals was intended to finance all opponents of Orbán and his Fidesz party in the April 12 elections.
He further suggests that public opinion polls indicating a possible defeat of Orbán and Fidesz may have been funded, at least in part, with money from Ukraine.
Simić recalls that Orbán has accused Ukraine of attempting to interfere in Hungary’s upcoming elections, and recently told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that Hungary would not be intimidated.
He notes that Orbán intensified anti-Ukrainian rhetoric last year, accusing his electoral opponent Péter Magyar of entering into a pact with Kyiv to establish a pro-Ukrainian government in Budapest, while also opposing financial and military aid to Ukraine and its EU membership.
Simić also points out that Orbán criticized the Brussels elite’s approach toward Russia, particularly for depriving citizens of access to affordable Russian energy, and for failing to take U.S. President Donald Trump seriously—effectively burning bridges with the world’s leading power.
He recalls Orbán describing EU sanctions on affordable energy as “political madness,” arguing that regardless of one’s views on Putin, leaders must prioritize their own people, and that the only real outcome of sanctions on Russian energy is the humiliation of European politicians.
According to Simić, some Hungarian opposition leaders claim that Orbán’s behavior represents not only a political issue but also a security risk for Europe, while Orbán and Fidesz counter such claims by arguing that they are part of coordinated external pressure aimed at influencing the election outcome.
“As the elections in Hungary approach, Brussels—according to observers—is balancing between the need to protect its own security and the desire to avoid direct interference in the internal politics of a member state,” Simić writes.
He also recalls that SNSD leader Milorad Dodik has made it clear that Orbán’s victory is important for the Serb world, noting that Orbán, like Trump, Putin, and Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, defends traditional values and opposes what he described as “monstrous anti-human globalism” and the uncontrolled migrant crisis.
Simić adds that Dodik strongly condemned threats made by Ukrainian President Zelensky toward Orbán, describing them as an open act of hostility and an attack on the sovereignty of a state, emphasizing that this is not merely a diplomatic dispute but a serious indicator of political intolerance toward leaders who pursue different policies.
Dodik, Simić recalls, stated that Republika Srpska will remain aligned with its allies, emphasizing that Hungary and Orbán are proven and reliable friends of the Serb people.
He also notes that Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić said Orbán has done many good things for Serbia, and that it would be unfair and ungrateful not to acknowledge satisfaction with cooperation, expressing hope that Orbán will win the elections and reaffirming that Serbs and Hungarians will always remain brothers.
Finally, Simić recalls that Trump publicly supported Orbán’s re-election, describing him as a strong leader, a reliable ally, and a true friend, fighter, and winner, while SNS president Miloš Vučević called on Serbian citizens of Hungarian nationality to vote for Orbán and Fidesz in the April 12 elections.
Source: RTRS
