Written by Dušan Pavlović, Director of the Centre for Socio-Political Research of the Republika Srpska
When, just two hundred years ago, in 1805, Sultan Selim III issued a firman ordering that Serbs from Sarajevo and its surroundings no longer be hanged or impaled in the courtyard and at the gate of the Old Church in Sarajevo, it was not a consequence of the Ottoman Empire’s Sharia judiciary granting legal protection to Serbs. Rather, it was a direct consequence of the reality established by the First Serb Uprising in 1804.
The sentiments of Christians in then-occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina are best reflected in a report by two Franciscans from Široki Brijeg, who wrote to their archbishop in Đakovo that they barely managed to prevent their congregation from joining the movement led by Karađorđe in a national fervor.
That Selim III’s decision was dictated by the Christian rebellion rather than a shift in Sharia judiciary attitudes is confirmed by the continuation of his order. The firman explicitly stated that the punishment of hanging and impalement should continue (even though there was already a practice of crucifying Serbs at the main gate of the churchyard of this oldest Christian place of worship in Sarajevo and its surroundings), but at “more suitable” locations in other neighborhoods!
Science has proven that, following the tragic experience of the Holocaust, the DNA structure of Jews was altered in certain ways. Can we then assume the magnitude of the transgenerational trauma suffered by Serbs and other Christians after nearly five centuries of suffering and terror under such Sharia judiciary rule imposed by the Ottoman-Turkish aggressor? Did this legal system and judiciary, over almost five hundred years, cause some alterations in the DNA structure of Serbs?
At the same time, the liturgical consciousness and ethos of the Serb people and their elites preserved awareness of personal responsibility for each individual and, consequently, the opportunity for renewal with each new generation. This is why the poet’s verses—”Stay here, the sun of foreign skies…”—came into existence when, following the Austro-Hungarian occupation, Muslim Serbs left today’s territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina en masse, migrating to Turkey.
It was precisely this new occupier who, through its policy of identity engineering, divided the Serbs along religious lines and planted the seeds of the “Bosniak” project. Over time, this project ideologically mutated, re-emerging at the “Holiday Inn” in late September 1993 in a new form. At its core, it was pan-Islamist; functionally, it served the Euro-Atlanticist and globalist agenda.
To the great misfortune of all in the former Yugoslavia and beyond, instead of Fikret Abdić, a proponent of traditional Islam who was democratically elected, a fraud led to the installation of the author of the “Muslim Brotherhood” manifesto—Alija Izetbegović. Thus, the ideologue and leader of the pan-Islamist structure of the “Muslim Brotherhood” in Bosnia and Herzegovina became Europe’s first “Zelenskyy,” dragging his people and all neighboring peoples into a bloody civil war to create an Islamic state in Europe governed by Sharia law. Simultaneously, this served the broader objective of NATO expansion eastward.
At the start of the civil war, they forcefully took over the Islamic Community in Bosnia and Herzegovina, appointing Mustafa Cerić as reis, thereby securing the “Muslim Brotherhood’s” control over this religious structure—a control that remains to this day.
All present-day political leaders and members of the Muslim-Bosniak political and military elite emerged from Izetbegović’s ranks, from Lagumdžija onward. According to now-available information, Alija Izetbegović’s closest associate facilitated approximately 18 million dollars in aid to Osama bin Laden. It is no surprise, then, that Islamist structures from Bosnia and Herzegovina were directly involved in planning and executing the September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States. Ordinary people, both Muslim and non-Muslim, were sacrificed for the radical political Islam agenda.
Since the strategic goal of establishing an Islamic Sharia state in Europe was not fully realized through armed conflict due to the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement, its implementation continued through other means. At first, the Christian communities in Bosnia and Herzegovina—Serbs and Croats—did not fully understand why the Muslim/Bosniak side persisted with its project of majorization over non-Muslims, effectively pushing for a unitary state.
Their greatest obstacle was the fact that Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina was established through an international peace agreement and that its constitution—Annex 4 of that agreement—is also an international treaty signed by Republika Srpska and the Federation of BiH as warring parties and contracting sides. Therefore, they required assistance from the political West and Islamic countries such as Iran, Turkey, Qatar, and others to forge a judiciary at the state level of BiH—an unnatural hybrid of globalist lawfare (the misuse of legal mechanisms to destroy political opponents) and the Sharia-imposed practices described at the beginning of this text.
To ensure that this judicial mutant—based on rules dictated by the most powerful globalist players while simultaneously relying on the aforementioned Sharia practices that flagrantly discriminate against Christians and other non-Muslims in Bosnia and Herzegovina—also had a “hump on its back,” one failed German politician with the mentality of a Nazi gauleiter, backed by Germany itself, was sent here.
Just as foreign “benevolent souls” and their domestic allies once insisted that the political West, i.e., the globalist occult elites, were not attacking and killing us but merely “evil” Slobodan Milošević, today they try to convince us that they are not attacking the Serb people and Republika Srpska but only “evil” Milorad Dodik. Perhaps the problem is with us—since no matter whom we elect as our political leader over the last three decades, they somehow become “evil” in the eyes of our enemies and misguided compatriots, prompting another attempt to destroy us to eliminate that “evil.”
U.S. Vice President Vance recently addressed the established practice of lawfare in Germany, which is based on globalist occult structures, citing the case of Romania. Naturally, as a sincere Christian and advocate of traditional values, Vice President Vance would undoubtedly have much to say about the political persecution of the democratically elected president of Republika Srpska—a signatory to Annex 4, i.e., the Constitution of BiH.
One can only imagine what President Donald Trump might say—or what he will say—when he realizes that American taxpayers’ money has, for decades, funded the birth and growth of a globalist-Sharia judicial mutant, complete with a Nazi “hump” as the cherry on top.
The leadership of Republika Srpska has a constitutional and international legal obligation to use all available democratic means to protect the Serb constituent people and all citizens of Srpska, as well as the Dayton Constitution—Annex 4 as an international agreement to which it is a signatory, defining the role and mandate of the Constitutional Court in BiH. Furthermore, Srpska is obligated to safeguard the Dayton Peace Agreement itself, which, along with all its annexes, remains binding international law under UN Security Council Resolution 1031.
Despite a painful history, Serbs and Croats have managed to find a common foundation for coexistence in Bosnia and Herzegovina, embodied in the Dayton structure of BiH and Annex 4 as an internationally recognized constitutional framework.
However, once globalist Murphy leaves BiH and the “hump” is removed from the judicial mutant, the lingering issue will remain—pan-Islamist and globalist structures that strive to prevent stability through the Dayton framework.
Anyone familiar with the region’s history and political realities knows that dismantling Dayton’s framework means establishing a unitary, i.e., Islamic Sharia state.
Thus, when we look beyond the surface of media and political narratives, the ultimate question emerges: Will peace and stability in Bosnia and Herzegovina be upheld through the institutional defense of the Dayton Constitution and its framework, or will the judicial mutant, through its anti-Dayton actions, pave the way for the realization of a pan-Islamist project—the creation of a unitary, i.e., Islamic/Sharia state in Europe?
Source: CDPIRS
