AnalysisNewest

Mitrović: Imposing the “law on state property” would be a gross violation of international law by Schmidt

Mitrović: Imposing the “law on state property” would be a gross violation of international law by Schmidt

By imposing the “law on state property,” Christian Schmidt would be flagrantly violating international law, of which the Dayton Peace Agreement is an integral part, as well as the Constitution of BiH, claims legal expert Slavko Mitrović.

“The two entities are the decision-making subjects regarding the territory within BiH as the exclusive possessors and owners of the territory determined by the Dayton Agreement. Had it been intended for post-war BiH to have any rights concerning territorial ownership, including property, it would have been explicitly stated, at least as an exception to the rule of the entities’ rights,” Mitrović emphasized in his column for Glas Srpske.

If there had been any legal basis for “state property of BiH,” Mitrović argues, it would have been enforced long ago by a decision of the BiH Constitutional Court or a previous high representative confirmed by the UN Security Council, instead of waiting for a German tourist and his advisors from Sarajevo’s Western embassies.

He described the governance of the false high representative Christian Schmidt, with support from Western embassies in Sarajevo, nicknamed the “Quint countries,” as rogue rule.

“They are, in fact, the ‘septic countries’ that have poisoned relations for years and nullified the possibility of an agreement between the democratically elected representatives of the two entities and the three constituent peoples in BiH,” Mitrović said.

He noted that this is accompanied by the enthusiasm and servility of political Sarajevo.

“That German tourist, a self-proclaimed corrupt high representative, has accumulated about a million euros during his 40-month stay in BiH, tax-free, plus expenses, and various additional benefits and privileges,” said Mitrović.

He claims that “plunderer Schmidt” intends to seize Republika Srpska’s property – agricultural land, forests, waters, mines, and all structures built before the start of the war in BiH in 1992.

“Most of the existing schools, hospitals, kindergartens, bridges, roads, streets, squares, railway and bus stations, cultural centers, power plants, dams and embankments, water systems, quarries, and much more will be declared ‘state property of Bosnia and Herzegovina’ by C.S.,” Mitrović stated.

He explained that this “state property” would be registered in land and cadaster records as the ownership of “the state of BiH.”

“Thus, an inflated, Schmidt-driven Bosniak BiH would, as an act of charity, allow Republika Srpska to use some of that ‘state property’ for the needs of its residents. Srpska would have neither ownership nor control over that property, a privilege that Brčko District, jointly owned by Srpska and FBiH, currently enjoys,” Mitrović concluded.

Source: RTRS

Shares: